In case you missed it...

 

Free speech:

Supporters of the Obama-era plan to regulate the Internet have been busy protesting the Federal Communications Commission’s recent decision to reverse course. Known as “net neutrality,” the regulations would have essentially treated the Web as a utility — subjecting it to heavy-handed FCC rules originally designed to govern telephone companies in the early 20th century. Recently, FCC Chairman Ajit Pai announced that he will be reversing the rules, causing backlash among supporters of big government. These opponents of Pai, however, don’t seem to have a coherent message around which they can rally. Claiming they want “a free and accessible” Internet, the net-neutrality advocates gathered in front of the FCC building this last week, demanding he censor a handful of “controversial” websites. (Read more)

 

Education:

“Social justice” isn’t something normally seen as a key component of mathematics — but one online course aimed at teachers hopes to make it so. “Teaching Social Justice Through Secondary Mathematics” was developed by Teach for America and is being offered through EdX. In part, the class description explains that “mathematics has been used as a dehumanizing tool” for centuries. Incoherently, the class instructs teachers to keep politics out of their math class but then strongly encourages them to “blend secondary math instruction with topics such as inequity, poverty, and privilege” in an effort to “transform students into global thinkers.” (Read more)

 

Government regulations:

Senate Democrats in Washington D.C. are trying to limit lawmakers’ ability to review regulations implemented by largely unaccountable bureaucrats. The partisan legislation would kill the 1996 Congressional Review Act, making it more difficult for lawmakers to evaluate and reverse onerous regulations. Among other things, the bill — sponsored by Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ) — would immediately reinstate the 14 regulations that have been overturned by congress in the past few months. (Read more)

 

Civil Asset Forfeiture:

The Connecticut House of Representatives passed a major reform to that state’s civil-asset-forfeiture laws this week. The House passed HB7146, which would require a criminal conviction before authorities are allowed to permanently seize assets under civil asset forfeiture rules. If enacted, Connecticut would join a handful of other states that have similar restrictions in place. A recent attempt in Nevada, on the other hand, died in the state senate earlier this year. (Read more)

 

Nevada’s 79th Legislature:

Nevada parents are letting their voice be heard when it comes to Education Savings Accounts. Moms, dads and even educators showed up to a recent legislative hearing to testify before lawmakers on the importance of educational choice. At times, things got emotional, as parents explained that ESAs are critical in providing their children with the opportunity for a better education. (Watch the video)

 

 

In case you missed it...

 

Asset forfeiture:

Beyond violations of due process and individual rights, civil asset forfeiture is recognized as a serious criminal justice issue because it incentivizes abuse of the system. Why? Because assets seized through the process directly benefit the law enforcement agencies involved. Of course, some states are worse than others on this front. In Hawaii, for example, the seized assets must be used to “fight crime.” But that’s a term with a lot of latitude for interpretation. The Maui police department, for example, felt the best way to “fight crime” with seized assets was to purchase new ice makers. (Read more)

                                                                                                                                    

Cronyism:

Elon Musk likes to fashion himself as an environmental capitalist — but there’s not much about his business model that is actually capitalistic. Musk’s latest announcement is that he plans to produce “solar roofs” for homes — roof tiles that act as solar arrays, without creating the eyesore of traditional panels. Making the scheme affordable, however, is really only possible thanks to massive federal tax credits awarded to Musk’s company for each installed roof. Once again, Musk shows that he is extremely talented at using “environmentalism” to make money off unsuspecting taxpayers. (Read more)

 

Government corruption:

The larger the school district, the more corruption seems to follow. In late September 2013, CCSD Trustee Erin Cranor came across information indicating that she and fellow trustees had been misled about the actual costs of an insurance contract the district was expected to sign. Rather than costs falling, as trustees had been told, they were actually rising — between $6 and $7 million. Moreover, the new contract contained a massive, unacknowledged increase to the insurance broker’s commission. When Cranor raised the issue, it became clear that district corruption was running deeper than the public realized. (Read more)

 

Federal lands:

Before leaving office, the Obama Administration imposed land use restrictions on more than 72 million acres of western lands — but those protections may not remain in place for very long, thanks to a rarely used anti-regulatory tool. The Congressional Review Act of 1996 gives President Trump and the Republican congress the ability to reverse much of Obama’s last-minute actions on public lands. According to the Pacific Legal Foundation, the act allows Congress to essentially vote on the slew of land-use restrictions. (Read more)

 

 

In case you missed it...

Communism:

Left-wing journalist Vivian Gornick published an op-ed in the New York Times this week, nostalgically recalling the days when many Americans were seduced by the promises of Communism. “America was fortunate to have had the communists here,” she quoted her mother as saying. “They, more than most, prodded the country into becoming the democracy it always said it was.” Her praise for American communists in the early 20th century didn’t stop with her mother’s words. In fact, throughout the piece, Gornick celebrated the communist movement — the very political ideology that was responsible for nearly 100 million deaths in the 20th century alone. (Read more)

 

Government corruption:

New York City’s expensive, convoluted and decidedly arbitrary system for issuing handgun permits is already a gross infringement on New Yorkers’ Second Amendment rights. As it turns out, however, it is also ripe for corruption. As with most overly bureaucratic, heavy-handed government entities, New York’s handgun licensing department has been plagued with scandals. In one of the most recent cases, handgun permits were essentially up for auction to the highest bidder — often being given to known criminals while the agency routinely denied permits to law-abiding citizens. (Read more)

 

Climate and environmental:

It comes as no surprise that the Nevada legislature is, yet again, going to try to micromanage the energy market through a variety of new renewable energy mandates and subsidies. Sadly, it is even less of a shock that there is little-to-no pushback against these initiatives. After all, just look at the way the climate-change lobby labels anyone who questions their policies as a “climate denier.” The truth is, however, these environmentalists are more about cronyism than they are about saving polar bears or preserving the environment. (Read more)

 

Education:

It’s worth repeating: Among parents, educational choice is not a partisan issue. According to a recent study, about 60 percent of Californians support the idea of school choice — including about half of self-described liberals. The results echo an earlier survey done in 1998, where 58 percent of California residents supported the concept. And yet, school choice initiatives have been repeatedly blocked in the state, thanks to massive campaigns funded by the California Teachers Association and other public unions. Which is also unsurprising — unions, after all, aren’t paid to represent the interests of children, parents or students. (Read more)

 

Fiscal and taxes:

Former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s national war on sugary drinks lost another battle this week. After pouring $1.5 million into an initiative campaign to impose a “soda tax” in Santa Fe, New Mexico, the billionaire saw voters come out in droves to soundly reject the nanny-state measure. The voter turnout was higher than the previous mayoral election, and 58 percent of voters rejected the 2 cent per ounce proposal. (Read more)

 

 

 

PERS secrecy bill: A rebuttal

The PERS secrecy bill (SB384) will be heard tomorrow by the Assembly Committee on Government Affairs. The advocates for secrecy claim that publicizing the names and pension amount of PERS members would lead to cybercrime — a claim flatly rejected by:

  1. Three Nevada courts, including a unanimous state Supreme Court opinion;
  2. A top national organization working to educate the public about identity theft — the Identity Theft Resource Center;
  3. Dozens of courts in the 35 states nationwide that make this information public;
  4. The Nevada PERS Retirement Board itself, which voted 7-0 to support the original version of SB384 that made names and payout data public;
  5. Real world experience. As the RGJ Editorial Board astutely noted, “if millions of public retirees’ data has been released for many years across Nevada and the nation and none has been linked to identify theft, the case has been made for lack of harm, not future danger.”

Against that consensus, the arguments for PERS secrecy are best epitomized by state Senator David Parks, who stated before voting to make his $100,000 taxpayer-funded pension secret that:

“As a retired public employee myself, I share the same concerns that [advocates of the bill] have.”

While most view such a blatant conflict of interest as a compelling reason to err on the side of transparency, the majority of Senate Democrats would prefer to keep the public in the dark, as evidenced by their having passed SB384 11-10 last month.

Now that the arguments for secrecy have been roundly rejected by every possible authoritative source, it should be obvious that this bill is not about shielding retirees from possible cybercrime — it’s about shielding the system from transparency, accountability and public scrutiny, while still forcing taxpayers to send PERS $1.5 billion each and every year.

 

In case you missed it...

Constitutional issues:

State Senator Heidi Gansert is pushing back against NPRI’s lawsuit, which asserts she is in violation of the Nevada Constitution by occupying government positions in the legislature and the executive branch simultaneously. “In her motion to dismiss [the NPRI lawsuit], Senator Gansert essentially (and unilaterally) rewrites the relevant section of the Nevada constitution, then alleges her rewrite warrants dismissal of the suit,” commented NPRI’s Center for Justice and Constitutional Litigation Director Joseph Becker. (Read more)

 

Government waste and corruption:

Large school districts — like most large monopolies — tend to be full of corruption and abuse. Clark County School District is no different. From deliberately hiding large scale projects from trustees, to misleading trustees about the cost of insurance, the Nevada Journal has highlighted a handful of examples. And they’re not isolated incidents. In fact, such incidents are merely indicators of a much larger culture of waste and abuse within the District. (Read more)

 

Minimum wage:

Researchers at Harvard Business School recently published a study looking into the effects minimum-wage hikes have on one of the industries most susceptible to such increases: the food service industry. The study, which focused on the Bay Area, found that wage increases triggered restaurant closures in a big way. Unsurprisingly, new restaurants and those with lower-priced menus were especially hard hit by the area’s recent wage hikes. Likely, this is due to the fact that higher quality restaurants have more flexibility to raise prices and absorb costs. Also noted in the study is the fact that higher minimum wages tend to deter entrepreneurial restaurateurs from opening new locations. (Read more)

 

Education:

Despite spending more than $23,000 per student, New York City kids are not receiving the kind of education they should. In grades three to eight, only 36 percent of kids in New York City Department of Education schools are earning a passing score in math. In English, the pass rate was just 38 percent. Many inner city schools are even worse. And yet, rather than change the way education is delivered, or open the system up to more educational options, Mayor Bill De Blasio has another plan: government funded pre-pre-K. The program would be aimed at getting children as young as 3 years old enrolled in an already failing government education system. (Read more)

 

Fiscal and economy:

The world is changing. Within human society, the economy that gives birth to mankind’s jobs and occupations, has transformed time and time again, from agricultural to industrial to whatever we are experiencing now. Sometimes sociologists call our current era a “postindustrial economy,” which, as Senator Ben Sasse writes in the Wall Street Journal, is basically “another way of saying ‘we don’t have anything to call it.’” These kinds of changes are disruptive, and require innovation and entrepreneurship to overcome. The “team sport” mentality of bitter modern politics, however, is making this most recent economic (and social) transformation even more difficult than normal. (Read more)

 

 

In case you missed it...

Nevada legislature:

A bill before the Nevada Legislature aims to make the names of public employees in the state retirement system exempt from public-records requirements. The move to make PERS information secret and inaccessible by the public has been nearly universally denounced by transparency organizations and Nevada press outlets — primarily because it is “based upon unfounded fears,” and “weakens scrutiny of government fraud, abuse and waste,” according to the Reno Gazette-Journal’s most recent editorial. Notably, the entire RGJ editorial board agreed the bill was a bad idea — except for one member who, himself, is a public-employee retiree. (Read more)

 

Taxes and fiscal:

One bill working its way through the legislature has really fallen under most people’s radar. Senate Bill 149 would, ostensibly, open the way for a light rail line between McCarran International Airport and the Strip. But, in reality, it would allow local transportation agencies the ability to suggest commerce-tax increases for expensive new transportation-related projects. In other words: it would allow yet another government-funded agency to lobby for higher taxes on the local level. (Read more)

 

Cronyism:

Clark County Commission Chairman Steve Sisolak is confident that the new partially taxpayer-funded Raiders Stadium will be built by the beginning of the 2020 NFL season. In order to do that, however, Sisolak expects local spending on infrastructure projects to be accelerated. Moreover, everything related to the Raiders’ deal — including NFL schedules, team plans and other infrastructure-related projects — will have to be completed without any delays or distractions. (Read more)

 

Progressivism:

What does it mean to be “progressive” in politics? It’s a word that is often thrown around by politicians — and for good reason. After all, it sounds forward-thinking and compassionate, right? Well, judging by policy ideas and the effects of “progressive” initiatives, it might not be nearly as forward-thinking as people on the left believe it is. (Watch the video)

 

Education:

It’s hardly a surprise that there would be waste, fraud and abuse in the Clark County School District. But the extent to which this waste and abuse has cost taxpayers is positively astounding. In 2008, a private consultant who was being paid handsomely to help CCSD streamline their bureaucracy walked away from the project because the district refused to accept any of his important suggestions. Moreover, the higher-up responsible for deep-sixing his suggestions later found herself in hot water after taking over $20,000 in “sick leave” pay, while actually working fulltime for a county in another state. (Read more)

 

 

In case you missed it...

Nevada’s 79th Legislative Session:

Property taxes, minimum wage hikes, labor union handouts, renewable energy mandates, attacks on transparency and plenty of other bad ideas are making their way through Nevada’s legislature. The worst-of-the-worst are listed on NPRI’s Taxpayer Guide, and it’s easy to see a pattern: Politicians are anxious to find new ways to spend your money. Unfortunately, until lawmakers adjourn in early June, this relentless grab for taxpayer wallets is unlikely to stop. (Read more)

 

Minimum wage:

As Nevada legislators mull the possibility of raising the minimum wage, they should first look to our west and witness the real-world impacts of such increases. After raising the minimum wage in San Diego, local restaurant workers — a workforce especially sensitive to fluctuations in minimum wage — are finding it ever more difficult to find and keep a job. Restaurateurs have been raising menu prices and laying off workers across the board, just to keep already-thin profit margins in the black. For low-wage San Diego residents, it’s becoming increasingly clear that rather than getting a pay raise, they’re getting stuck with a higher cost of living and even fewer job opportunities. (Read more)

 

Education:

Nevada lawmakers are looking at ways to reduce, if not eliminate, the role of standardized tests in teacher evaluations. Democratic Assembly Speaker Jason Frierson said he’s always been “troubled” that the performance of teachers is gauged by how well the students they teach perform, when tested on what they’ve learned. If Frierson and his allies are successful, it would mark a sharp reversal from 2011 reforms that began including students performance in teacher evaluations. Governor Sandoval has said he’s open to potential changes. (Read more)

 

Over-regulation:

The video of a man being violently pulled off an overbooked United Airlines flight went viral this week. Kevin Williams, in the National Review, points out that the unpleasant episode has further fueled the general public’s disdain for the air-travel industry in general. And it’s easy to see why: Like banks, health-insurance companies and cable providers, airlines have steadily grown less and less responsive to the needs of its customers. As Williams puts it, “The managers act as though the business were organized for their benefit rather than for the customers, and that attitude seeps down to front-line workers.” So what, exactly, is causing this? (Read more)

 

Cronyism:

This week Tesla Motors saw its stock price climb to more than that of General Motors. It was an impressive milestone for the electric car manufacturer, which sold just under 80,000 cars last year. (By comparison, GM sold 80,000 Chevy Silverados in a mere eight weeks.) Clearly, plenty of investors believe in the future profitability and success of Tesla. Of course, this raises an important public policy question: If Tesla’s future looks so bright, why must it depend so heavily on taxpayer-funded subsidies for its very survival? (Read more)

 

 

In case you missed it...

Nevada’s 79th legislative session:

Senate Bill 384 aims to make the names of public employee retirees completely secret — exempting them from public record laws. As a recent Review Journal op-ed put it, “SB384 will gut accountability protections and breed further cynicism about our public institutions.” But, it’s actually worse than that. As written, the bill would make every single public employee’s name confidential. (Read more)

 

Supreme Court:

On Friday, the United States Senate confirmed Neil Gorsuch for the Supreme Court. The Senate voted 54-45 to seat Gorsuch on the high court after a 14-month vacancy left by the death of Justice Antonin Scalia in February 2016. Gorsuch’s appointment to the court means an end to the deadlock the court has seen recently on pivotal constitutional issues, including forced unionization and issues regarding regulatory overreach. (Read more)

 

Education:

Late Thursday evening, Arizona Governor Doug Ducey signed a law expanding his state’s Educational Savings Account program to every public school child. The change, making the state’s ESA program “universal,” means that almost any public school student in Arizona will be eligible to apply. The new rules cap the number of new entrants into the program to roughly 5,500 new students each year — but effectively eliminates most other enrollment restrictions. With Nevada’s neighbor expanding their successful ESA program, it is now up to Silver State lawmakers to decide if they will follow suit, or continue clinging to a failed status quo. (Read more)

 

Free speech:

When governments fear dissent, they often try to censor those who speak out. When censorship doesn’t work, or isn’t an option, government often just settles for simple harassment and surveillance. As the National Review points out, “This was true in the civil-rights era, when the state of Alabama tried to force the NAACP to divulge its membership lists.” More recently, the State of New York decided to channel the bully-tactics of segregation-era Alabama, and has taken aim at organizations bold enough to speak out about gun rights, tax reform, climate change and a number of other public policy issues. A new challenge to New York’s complex web of regulations, however, hopes to put an end to this state-sponsored attempt at regulating public-policy debates. (Read more)

 

Healthcare:

The GOP’s first attempt to supposedly “repeal and replace” the Affordable Care Act went down in flames. But why? Well, for starters, the Republican plan failed to attract enough Republicans to survive any substantial debate in the legislature. More importantly, however, is the fact that it didn’t actually repeal or replace the core tenants of Obamacare — in fact, it preserved them. (Read more)

 

In case you missed it...

 

Renewable Energy:

Assemblyman Justin Watkins, D-Las Vegas, has introduced Assembly Bill 270, legislation designed to reinstate net-metering subsidies for rooftop solar costumers. The proposed law would set a minimum credit of 11 cents per kilowatt hour for electricity fed back into a utility’s grid from a rooftop solar installation. The actual market price of power at the time — whether or not the utility company could purchase excess power from a cheaper source — is simply ignored. As NPRI has explained before, government coercion and price fixing — not necessarily the per-kilowatt price — is the real problem with net-metering mandates. (Read more)

 

Labor unions:

When public sector employees get paid leave-time to conduct union business, it costs taxpayers big time. According to a new report by the Office of Personnel Management, government employees spent nearly 3.5 million hours doing union business rather than government business — costing taxpayers $162.5 million in 2014 alone. (Read more)

 

Fiscal and taxes:

Tax season is officially here — and it’s costing the American economy billions of dollars. Taxpayers spend an estimated 6.1 billion hours and $234 billion every year complying with the tax code. And things are only expected to get worse. According to Pete Sepp, president of the National Taxpayers Union, “The paperwork burden inventory at the Office of Management and Budget related to Treasury is expected to rise by another two billion hours in the next few years.” That alone could push tax compliance costs above $400 billion per year. (Read more)

 

Free markets:

Nevada lawmakers this session are again taking aim at ridesharing companies such as Uber and Lyft. One bill would give the Nevada Taxicab Authority — which has been exceptionally hostile to the concept of ridesharing — authority over the industry. Another unfriendly proposal put forward by Taxicab Authority allies was to require ridesharing consumers to wait fifteen minutes for their ride. It was killed earlier this week. (Read more)

 

Education reform:

Large school districts, such as Clark County, have historically been plagued by inefficiencies, fraud and corruption. As it turns out, the primary root of the problem likely lies in the particular way in which schools have tried to lessen corruption: through ever-tighter layers of centralization, bureaucratic oversight, detailed standard operating procedures and a growing administrative state. Just like any other overly bureaucratic entity, the larger school districts become, the less responsive they are to the actual needs of those they serve. (Read more)

 

 

Analysis of SB384

Update: A proposed amendment makes Section 2 much worse by making PERS names private as well, leaving only payout amounts to unknown recipients! 

As written, section 1 of SB384 makes all information about public employees, with the exception of their name, job title and salary, confidential under state law. Existing law already provides robust protections that make sensitive information about public employees — such as social security numbers and home addresses — confidential. By declaring that, absent their name, job title and salary, “all other informationabout public employees is confidential, SB384 would represent a dramatic reversal of existing law by enshrouding the activities of government in a veil of secrecy.

Section 2 addresses retirees who are currently receiving a benefit from the Public Employees’ Retirement System of Nevada (PERS). By declaring that the name, benefit amount and last employer of those receiving a benefit from PERS is public and making everything else confidential, SB384 would significantly narrow existing law. Furthermore, it would make confidential the very information necessary to provide context to benefit amounts — such as years of service, year of retirement and retirement type.

Without those contextual fields of data, the public value in disclosing name and benefit amount is greatly reduced. Just as salary information is intertwined with the number of hours worked — the value of a $25,000 salary changes drastically if it comes with a 1-hour workweek instead of the standard 40 hours — a similar relationship exists between years of service and pension benefit amount.

This is why this information is currently public in Nevada and 35 other states nationwide. The State of New Jersey even publishes these supplemental fields, and several more, on the official state government website: https://data.nj.gov/dataset/YourMoney-Retired-Pension-Members/nma7-ti96/data.

As written, SB384 would overturn existing Nevada law and make these fields of data — which are necessary to lend perspective to the payout amounts and identify cases of disability fraud — confidential. Moreover, it is not clear what benefit, if any, this would provide. In fact, making the contextual data private would only undermine the public interest that SB384 seeks to provide in making retirees’ name and benefit amount public.

Or, to put it another way, why would years of service be considered more sensitive than a retiree’s name and benefit amount?

Existing law already makes truly sensitive information — such as social security number, home address, etc. — private. If SB384 seeks to reaffirm this, it can do so by specifying that the entirety of the necessary contextual elements of a retiree’s benefit are public, while then reaffirming the unrelated, sensitive pieces of information remain exempt from disclosure. 

SB384 will be heard March 31, 2017 at 1:00PM by the Senate Committee on Government Affairs. Click here to share your opinion with your legislator on SB384 or any other bill currently before the Legislature.

Total Records: 2050

next 10 »