ESA update: ACLU lawsuit and hearing

Good morning All,

Several of you have contacted me asking for an update on the ACLU lawsuit to stop Nevada's ESA program. I got the lowdown before the holiday break…

Recently, Nevada's attorney general's office filed a motion to dismiss the ACLU's lawsuit. You may recall, the ACLU lawsuit seeks to stop the ESA program, claiming the program violates the state's constitution because parents may choose to educate their children at religious schools. Last week, the parents who intervened (in support of ESAs), represented by the Institute for Justice, filed a written joinder in the state's motion. Also, amicus briefs were submitted by Friedman, Foundation for Excellence in Education, and the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty all in support of the state's motion to dismiss. 

There is currently a hearing set on the motion to dismiss for Nov. 25. The ACLU now has to respond to all of those filings.  They may request an extension of time to do so. So I will keep this on my radar to see if there will actually be a hearing on Nov. 25 or not. I'll let you know the latest.

In the second lawsuit, supported by the Rogers Foundation, a motion for a preliminary injunction was filed. In layman terms, that's the motion to stop the program from starting until the case has been decided. The Responses to that motion are due on Nov. 9. There is no hearing set on the motion for preliminary injunction.

Nevada Attorney General Adam Laxalt has partnered with former U.S. Solicitor General Paul Clement and his law firm, Bancroft, to fight these battles.

Karen

 

ESA update: Funding starts in February, Kindergarteners don’t need 100 days

Happy Monday, friends!

As you know, the Nevada State Treasurer held another ESA hearing last week. And, boy, was it a meeting! “Surprise! Surprise! Surprise!” was the theme of the day.

Since July, the Treasurer has been encouraging and welcoming input from the public. And if you attended the first two hearings, you know there’s been no lack of public input. In direct response to your testimony, emails and phone calls, Treasurer Dan Schwartz started Tuesday’s meeting with several critical announcements.

First, Schwartz announced ESA funding is expected to begin in February, not April as previously anticipated.  That’s two months earlier than initially expected! Nevada families now have better opportunity of transferring to their new educational option at semester, a natural transition period.

Additionally, the Treasurer announced that families who’ve applied early to Nevada’s ESA will have the opportunity in the coming months to select the funding date most appropriate for them. Families can choose to begin funding in either February, May or August, meaning eligible participants can submit their early application by November 30th and later choose to begin funding in August, allowing students to finish out the school year in their current placement. 

Here’s the new funding schedule:

  • First week of February 2016
  • First week of May 2016
  • First week of August 2016
  • First week of November 2016

The Treasurer also accepted two amendments to the proposed regulations. The first amendment is that children entering the Nevada school system for the first time and going into kindergarten — and the child must be under age 7 — will not be required to satisfy the 100 consecutive school days requirement prior to applying for the ESA program. The second amendment concerns children of parents who are active duty members of the military and are based in Nevada. They will also be able to apply without meeting the required 100 consecutive school days in public schools. A revised application is forthcoming.

Because these two amendments make substantive changes to the final proposed regulations, the law requires another adoption hearing to be held. That new meeting agenda was posted last Friday and will take place on Monday, November 23, 2015, at 10:00 A.M., so mark your calendars. The regulations will then go to the Legislative Commission for final approval. I will have more information on that process as the regulations advance.

Due to the new funding dates, revised application periods for 2016 are expected. I will keep you posted.

Finally, it was revealed that vendor registration forms are close — a few weeks away, if all goes as planned. 

As always, feel free to email or call me at 702-222-0642 with any questions or need for clarification.

Have a great week!

Karen

 

Three examples of the failure of government

Every week, NPRI President Sharon Rossie writes a column for NPRI's week-in-review email. If you are not getting our emails, which contain our latest commentaries and news stories, you can sign up here to receive them.


Don’t the promises of liberals sound grand?

Like free healthcare. Higher wages. Free college education.

Of course, these are a bit like the promises either of my two children would have made if they had been running for President of the Rossie household when they were five or six years old.

Vote for me, and we’ll eat out five times a week. We’ll go to the movies every night, someone else will clean your room and I’ll put a unicorn in the backyard.

Those kind of pie-in-the-sky promises are cute when you’re six. When you’re seventy and don’t have a plan to pay for the fast food and cinema — or “free” health care or college you’re promising — it’s a bit disturbing.

There are two main problems with liberalism, socialism, communism or whatever the frontrunners of the Democratic Party are calling redistributionism these days.

First, it’s unjust. Redistribution involves giving someone something they didn’t earn by taking something from someone who did earn it.

The great classical-liberal economist Frédéric Bastiat labeled that “legalized plunder” in his book The Law.

Sometimes the law defends plunder and participates in it. Thus the beneficiaries are spared the shame, danger, and scruple which their acts would otherwise involve. Sometimes the law places the whole apparatus of judges, police, prisons, and gendarmes at the service of the plunderers, and treats the victim — when he defends himself — as a criminal. In short, there is a legal plunder ...

But how is this legal plunder to be identified? Quite simply. See if the law takes from some persons what belongs to them, and gives it to other persons to whom it does not belong. See if the law benefits one citizen at the expense of another by doing what the citizen himself cannot do without committing a crime.

Then abolish this law without delay, for it is not only an evil itself, but also it is a fertile source for further evils because it invites reprisals.

While I urge you to always remember the unjustness of using governmental force to “spread the wealth,” there’s a second problem with liberal pipe dreams.

They don’t work.

The news this week contained three examples from President Obama’s grand promises of eight years ago. First, the Heritage Foundation uncovered that over 97 percent of those who gained coverage under Obamacare last year did so because of Medicaid expansion. Since government subsidized co-ops, including the one here in Nevada, keep going belly-up, Obamacare has clearly failed.

That brings us to the second example, with New York Post reporting this week that “Obamacare is heading toward a death spiral.”

If you get insurance at work, you’re paying an extra tax to fund “reinsurance” for ObamaCare plans. It’s a fund to defray the cost of their most expensive enrollees.

So far, insurers have collected about $7.9 billion. Recent congressional testimony shows the payments kept ObamaCare sticker prices about 11 percent lower than they otherwise would have been. In short, you pay a tax to make ObamaCare look more affordable than it is.

But even with these hidden subsidies, ObamaCare isn’t working because the design is fatally flawed. The 5 percent of the population with serious medical conditions consume nearly 50 percent of the health care. When you try to sell insurance to sick and healthy people for the same price, the healthy don’t sign up. It’s too expensive.

Third, Obama’s mandate that doctors use electronic medical records — which greatly benefited the company of a top Obama donor — has produced an expensive boondoggle that looks to be hurting patients.

Michelle Malkin cites Robert Wachter, author of The Digital Doctor: Hope, Hype, and Harm at the Dawn of Medicine's Computer Age to describe the destruction: "Physicians retiring early. Small practices bankrupted by up-front expenses or locked into ineffective systems by the prohibitive cost of switching. Hours consumed by onerous data entry unrelated to patient care. Workflow disruptions. And above all, massive intrusions on our patient relationships."

So the next time Bernie or Hillary promise me the government can provide me free healthcare or college tuition, I’m going to pass. There’s a better chance my son or daughter found that unicorn for the backyard.

Warm regards,

Sharon J. Rossie
NPRI President


Remember, if you'd like to receive the latest from NPRI, sign-up for our emails here.

 

Upcoming hearing for final ESA regulations

Hello Friends,

Just a quick reminder: Next week Nevada treasurer Dan Schwartz will hold his office’s next hearing on proposed regulations for the Education Savings Account (ESA) program.

The hearing will take place Tuesday, October 20 at 10 a.m. in room 4100 at the Legislative Building, located at 401 Carson Street in Carson City. The meeting will also be video-conferenced to room 4401 in the Grant Sawyer building at 555 Washington Ave, Las Vegas.

It is important to voice your concerns and support for the proposed regulations during public comment or through written comments to the Treasurer. This is the last scheduled opportunity for the office to consider your input and modify the proposed regulations. The Treasurer asks that any glaring concerns be submitted to his office as soon as possible so any issues can be researched before next week’s meeting.

There’s no doubt that the Treasurer is well aware of parents’ opposition to the 100 school-day enrollment requirement — previous hearings have made that clear. And there’s no doubt Treasurer Schwartz supports waiving the requirement. Unfortunately, the reality of this issue is that waiving this requirement is not within the Treasurer’s scope of authority. It will take an act of the legislature to remove the 100 school-day enrollment mandate. When it comes time for that, I will be sure to let you know.

Currently, the Treasurer’s office is reviewing avenues to exempt active military from the enrollment mandate. An answer is anticipated by the October 20th hearing. I know Treasurer Schwartz and his staff all favor a military exemption and are working proactively for military families. However, ultimately the determining factors lie within the Treasurer’s particular scope of authority and the legislative record.

The other hot topic of the day, eligibility of Kindergarteners and other children under age 7, is still being worked on. I’m assured there will be clarity on this issue soon.

Tuesday’s hearing is a “hearing to adopt,” after which the regulations will go to the Legislative Commission for final approval. Then, once again, it will be time to pack the house.

Over the past few weeks, I’ve received several inquiries asking how a parent will know that an application has actually been received by the Treasurer. If you submitted an application through the new interactive online form, you should receive an email response giving you a case number. This lets you know your application has been received, but it does not guarantee that you have accurately completed the form. Be sure to upload all necessary documents with your application and include your email address.

If you submitted an application through US mail or through the PDF format that the Treasurer’s office initially offered, you are probably still waiting for a notice of receipt. Please, be patient with the process.

The office’s staffers are diligently working to get applications processed and the whole program up and running. Not only do they have to work on the regulations, draft vendor forms, answer phone calls and return emails, but staff also must manually input more than 2,200 applications and back up materials into the database.

Once all the applications are input, the notices will go out to applicants. Again, be sure to include all necessary documents and your email address. Applications in Spanish can be found here.

Speaking of vendor forms, the Treasurer’s office confirmed those forms are in development and will be out soon. So, all you schools and tutors out there, get ready!

As always, feel free to contact me with any questions.

Have a wonderful weekend!

~Karen

 

Dropped

Every week, NPRI President Sharon Rossie writes a column for NPRI's week-in-review email. If you are not getting our emails, which contain our latest commentaries and news stories, you can sign up here to receive them.


Over the last few years, NPRI has been helping teachers save up to $800 a year by letting them they know they can opt out of union membership.

You’ve been a big part of that campaign by spreading the word to those in your circle of influence. And we’ve all been thrilled to see thousands of teachers leave union membership, keeping millions in the pockets of teachers, instead of in the paws of liberal union officials.

Today, I’d like to ask for your help reaching teachers again.

As you probably know from NPRI’s past work and numerous media reports, Clark County School District teachers receive their health insurance from a union-managed organization called the Teachers Health Trust. THT has been running out of money over the past several years.

In a closed door meeting, Clark County Education Association officials even predicted the Trust would go belly up.

The Trust has cut back on the number of in-network doctors, and teachers have shared with us that THT only covers care in Clark County. If a teacher needs to see a doctor on a trip to Reno, the Trust won’t cover it. If a teacher is pregnant while visiting California and the her baby comes early, the Trust won’t cover the delivery.

Many teachers don’t know that or only learn about that limitation after receiving a very unexpected medical bill.

But what’s happening now is the worst thing of all and why we need your help to reach teachers.

THT is going to using a private company called WellHealth to provide a new health care plan. Under the guise of this transition, THT is requiring teachers to attend in-person an open enrollment event on an upcoming Saturday in November or December. That information is all available on THT’s website.

What they don’t mention on their website, but NPRI learned by calling THT’s office, is that teachers who don’t attend one of the open enrollment sessions will lose their health care coverage for their dependents.

THT told NPRI that for teachers who don’t attend one of the open enrollment sessions, the teacher will be defaulted to the new plan, but that THT won’t transfer over dependents. Absent a significant life event like a marriage or birth, dependents can’t be added until next year’s open enrollment ... in October 2016.

While teachers have confirmed to NPRI that THT is notifying teachers of their need to re-enroll by email and mail, teachers are worried that many of their colleagues will delete or throw away the messages without realizing their significance.

If THT really believes this reenrollment is necessary, they should be headlining these announcements with warnings like “Action needed to prevent your family from losing health coverage” and highlighting this on their RSVP page. Instead, it’s not even mentioned.

Unfortunately, this whole charade appears to be an attempt by THT to reduce its costs by giving it plausible deniability to eliminate health coverage for thousands of teachers’ spouses and children.

That’s where you and I come in. If you know a CCSD teacher, make sure they know about this open enrollment — and why they must attend.

While union bosses have created a scenario to deny health coverage for the families of teachers, you and I can help teachers keep their families covered by spreading the word immediately.

Warm regards,

Sharon J. Rossie
NPRI President


Remember, if you'd like to receive the latest from NPRI, sign-up for our emails here.

 

Date set for final ESA regulations hearing

Save the date, friends!

One last time for the Treasurer to get your input, so make your voice heard at the upcoming hearing for the Adoption of Regulations for Nevada’s Education Savings Account program. The hearing will be on Tuesday, October 20, 2015, at 10:00 A.M. 

You can find a draft of the final proposed regulations here.

Just like the other two ESA hearings, this meeting will be held at the Legislative Building in Carson City with video conference to the Grant Sawyer building in Las Vegas:

Legislative Building                                                  Grant Sawyer State Office Building

Suite 4100                                                                 Suite 4401

401 S. Carson Street                                                555 E. Washington Avenue

Carson City, NV                                                        Las Vegas, NV

The Treasurer's office again encourages anyone who has concerns about the regulations to provide their testimony in writing prior to the meeting by emailing it to: NevadaSchoolChoice@NevadaTreasurer.gov 

As always, I encourage everyone to participate in the process, whether you simply go to the hearing and watch, submit your comments in writing or speak at the hearing. Community turn-out and participation at previous hearings is to be applauded! Keep up the momentum.

If you saw the two previous meetings, you know it's reasonable to expect tremendous public participation — YAY! — this time around. Therefore, I would recommend submitting lengthy written comments in advance and summarizing orally in 2-3 minutes the key points during the hearing on October 20.

Remember, be sure you sign-in at the hearing — your attendance will be counted in the record. Typically, there should be copies of the proposed regulations by the sign-in sheet.  If not, don't be fearful about asking a staff person for a copy if you need one. Staff was wonderful in getting copies for us Las Vegas folks at the last hearing!  

Once the Treasurer adopts the regulations, they will be forwarded to the Legislative Commission for final approval. I'll be sure to let you know when that meeting is posted — hopefully in November. My fingers are crossed that this will all be final and other aspects of ESAs can move forward.

Speaking of moving forward, be sure to turn in your early application by November 30.  You've probably heard about the two lawsuits filed to try and stop the ESA program.  Well, they haven't stop anything so far and the treasurer's office wants parents to know early applications are still ongoing.  You can find the application here.  For an application in Spanish, click here.

As always, feel free to send me an email or call with any questions!

~Karen

 

Plummet

Every week, NPRI President Sharon Rossie writes a column for NPRI's week-in-review email. If you are not getting our emails, which contain our latest commentaries and news stories, you can sign up here to receive them.


When I returned to NPRI late this summer, the Institute and friends like yourself were just wrapping up our annual teacher union opt-out campaign.

It’s an effort that’s run for the last four years, and it informs Nevada educators and school district employees of their rights to opt out of union membership. Unlike states like California, Nevada workers enjoy the freedom to join — or not join — a union as they please. Their job and compensation are unaffected by not joining a union. But once teachers and other school district employees join their local affiliate of the Nevada State Education Association, they can only opt out between July 1 to 15.

This year, we received an email from a teacher that sums up why we do what we do.

Thank you for sending this out! I dropped my membership last year after 13 years of paying in because I thought I had to. We really need to get the word out regarding how our dues are spent! Thanks again for your effort!

That was one of numerous emails we received this summer after NPRI emailed teachers throughout the state informing them of their right to leave the union. We also reached teachers — including new teachers that are pressured to join the union at teacher orientation — through billboards positioned along busy thoroughfares and media coverage.

And the work paid off! As detailed in Sunday’s Las Vegas Review-Journal, membership in the Clark County Education Association, the state’s largest teachers union plummeted over the summer.

Our campaign and your efforts letting teachers in our circles of influence know about this option paid off in a big way.

In Clark County, 1,338 teachers either left the union after our educational campaign or chose not to join in the first place. That means 1,338 Clark County teachers joined thousands of other teachers who have, in recent years, decided to keep nearly $800 of would-be union dues in their pockets each year and exercise their personal freedom.

In the four years NPRI has led this effort, membership in the CCEA has fallen from 67 percent to 52 percent, with 7 percent of that drop being this year alone.

Teachers in Washoe County also exercised their right to choose and many left the union. A total of 163 teachers — or 4 percent of the Washoe Education Association’s members — left or chose not to join the union this summer.

Between Clark and Washoe, teachers are keeping over $1 million of their own money, instead of giving it to union bosses for causes they may disagree with.

Many teachers — a near majority in both Clark and Washoe — aren’t happy with their current union representation or they don’t see the value of paying hundreds of dollars a year to belong to a union that gives them little, if anything, in exchange for their dues. In the case of Clark County teachers, the CCEA was chosen as the official bargaining agent for teachers in 1969. We’ve found that over 99 percent of teachers working there today never had a voice in who represents them.

Teachers and all union members in Nevada deserve the chance to vote for their union representation. Lawmakers can make this happen by requiring unions to regularly be voted in by their members, ensuring unions are accountable to the people who fund them. It’s an idea NPRI pushed for in this past Legislative Session and will continue to fight for in the future.

And, you and the teacher whose email I shared above can be certain: We will continue to educate teachers until all of them know their rights.

Warm regards,

Sharon J. Rossie
NPRI President


Remember, if you'd like to receive the latest from NPRI, sign-up for our emails here.

 

The faces of ESAs

Hello friends,

The last time I wrote you, I asked you to send me your stories of what Nevada’s new Education Savings Accounts program means for you and your family.

I’ve heard from many of you. You’ve shared the stories of children long struggling in one-size-fits all classrooms that couldn’t possibly meet their unique needs; of kids who are high-performers, but due to lack of finances, have been unable to attend a school where they’re fully challenged; and from parents hoping their child will be the first college graduate in their family, if only he or she gets the chance to move out of a failing school into one that is exceptional.

We’re still looking for stories, so if you haven’t yet shared your account of how an Education Savings Account will help your child or your family, please reach out to me, by email or by phone, 702-222-0642. The personal stories are especially important as the State of Nevada, Nevada Policy Research Institute and other groups work to protect this program and ensure it is available for the children who so desperately need options.

As you’ve likely heard by now, two lawsuits threaten the future of this program. While the Treasurer’s office is still accepting applications and the program is on solid Constitutional ground, the powers at be, the media and the citizens of Nevada need to hear just who is being hurt by these baseless attacks: the children.

Fortunately, the Institute for Justice has come forward to help defend Nevada ESAs and, over the weekend, released a short video that provides a glimpse of the innocent children and families that will be hurt if opponents of school choice have their way. I encourage you to take a look at the video, then email me your story. As I mentioned before, it can be a short email or a more detailed one, but please put “ESA Story” in the subject line.

In the months going forward, NPRI will be sharing these stories as we work to preserve this important program. And I will keep you updated on everything you need to know to ensure your child has the brightest future possible.

Karen

 

Federal Lands

Every week, NPRI President Sharon Rossie writes a column for NPRI's week-in-review email. If you are not getting our emails, which contain our latest commentaries and news stories, you can sign up here to receive them.


When Sen. Ted Cruz came to Las Vegas last month to talk about what he’d do if elected president, Nevada Assemblywoman Victoria Seaman had one question for him.

Pointing to her copy of Solutions 2015, Assemblywoman Seaman asked Sen. Cruz where he stands on the issue of federal lands and what he, if elected, would do to transfer to the state some of the more than 56 million acres of Nevada soil the federal government occupies.

His position, as he explained it, is one I hope all presidential candidates — Democrat, Republican, or otherwise — take: the lands should be transferred to Nevada.

If you’ve been with the Institute for any length of time, you have likely read some of our previous publications and studies on the issue of federal lands and the problems that Nevada experiences as a result of over 81 percent of  its territory being held by an institution 3,000 miles away.

Because the federal government owns a greater percentage of Nevada than any other state, no candidate should leave the state without saying how he or she will allow Nevada and its residents to finally experience prosperity off property that is rightfully theirs. Even with title to just a portion of these federal lands, Nevada could generate millions of dollars a year and tens of thousands of jobs could be created.

An analysis produced by Nevada’s Land Management Task Force showed that local jurisdictions could generate $205.8 million a year if they were allowed to lease and sell just 7.2 million acres currently controlled by the Bureau of Land Management. With access to 45 million acres — leaving National Parks, military bases, Indian Reservations and wilderness areas designated by Congress untouched — local jurisdictions could generate $1.3 billion per year.

Transferring federally held lands to their rightful owners would also save taxpayers from across the country money, considering the amount of tax dollars the federal government wastes managing the acreage. According to the Property and Environment Research Center, for every dollar the federal government spends managing land, it loses 27 cents. States, on the other hand, create an average of $14.51 for each dollar they spend on such efforts.

The list of reasons to transfer the lands to Nevada go on and on (and are something we’ll be delving deeper into in an upcoming publication), but they all boil down to the fact that, as long as the federal government claims title to the vast majority of Nevada lands, the Silver State is helpless to achieve its full potential.

Fortunately, this important issue is not going unnoticed by some Presidential candidates and by concerned groups. Next week, the Black Mountain Institute will be hosting a panel discussion on the issue, aptly called, “This land is your land … or is it?”

The panel will include Gary Snyder, an environmentalist who has been called the “poet laureate of deep ecology;” Timothy Egan, a New York Times columnist and award-winning author; and economist and writer Terry L. Anderson, one of the leading advocates of free-market environmentalism. Virginia Scharff, a Western historian and director of the Center for the Southwest at the University of New Mexico, will moderate the panel.

The event, which I encourage you to attend if you’re in the Las Vegas area, will be held at 7 p.m. on Thursday, September 24 in the Philip J. Cohen Theatre at the University of Las Vegas student union.

And, I encourage you to brush up on federal lands issues so if you happen to meet one of the many, many candidates for President, you can ask what he or she would do to make Nevada as prosperous as it can be. I know I will.

Warm regards,

Sharon J. Rossie
NPRI President


Remember, if you'd like to receive the latest from NPRI, sign-up for our emails here.

 

Priorities

Every week, NPRI President Sharon Rossie writes a column for NPRI's week-in-review email. If you are not getting our emails, which contain our latest commentaries and news stories, you can sign up here to receive them.


Now that I’ve been back at NRPI for some time and had the opportunity to speak with and meet many of you and hear your hopes and concerns for Nevada, I’d like to share my vision for NPRI and show you what I believe we can accomplish together.

Based on the feedback I’ve received from so many of you over the past month and a half, it seems we’re all in agreement that the last Legislative Session was disappointing, to say the least. Despite the fact that we voters shot down a gross receipts tax just months earlier, our lawmakers passed a $1.5 billion tax increase, including a commerce tax that’s similar to the defeated margin tax in all the worst ways.

I, like many of you, am disheartened by the many Nevada lawmakers who rejected the will of the people and championed these destructive tax hikes.

But I won’t give up, and neither should you. The fight isn’t over.

NPRI, through our Center for Justice and Constitutional Litigation, is looking at the constitutionality of the commerce tax. Because the commerce tax has 27 different rates, we believe in may violate the Constitutional mandate, which says, “The Legislature shall provide by law for a uniform and equal rate of assessment and taxation ...”

We are also going to tell the stories of businesses that are hurt by this tax increase to make sure the public, the media and policy makers know how tax hikes affect the ordinary, working people who make Nevada great.

And, we plan to make it known which lawmakers voted like fiscal conservatives and which didn’t in our upcoming Legislative Review and Report Card. In this publication and others, we will continue to hold policy makers accountable to Nevada voters for their actions — good or bad. 

There are also two tax increases going to the ballot next year — a gas tax increase and a tax increase for school construction in Washoe County.  Just as we successfully did with the defeated margin tax, we will let Nevada citizens know why those tax increases aren’t necessary and show what will happen to working Nevadans, families, businesses and the economy if those taxes are approved.

We also are working to maximize and protect the one positive reform that came from the Legislative Session: Education Savings Accounts. As you’ve seen, we recently rolled out a new website, NevadaESA.com, and our staff have been meeting with parents and community members daily to inform them about this new program.

And now that this program is being challenged in court by the ACLU and other special interest groups — as we suspected it would be — NPRI’s work to help as many families as possible apply for ESAs while they can is more important than ever.

So far, over 3,000 applications have been filed, meaning there will be over 3,000 families standing to protect this groundbreaking program from those who want to limit choice and keep children in failing schools. Once it begins early next year, Nevada’s ESA program will be the most popular such school choice program in the country, proving that Nevada families are desperate to provide quality education to their children. 

This is our chance to show Nevada’s education establishment, and the rest of the country that school choice works. Having a successful ESA program won’t just improve educational outcomes for students, it’ll be the best guard we have against future tax increases.

What do you think of our priorities? Feel free to email me at any time.

Warm regards,

Sharon J. Rossie
NPRI President


Remember, if you'd like to receive the latest from NPRI, sign-up for our emails here.

Total Records: 1933

« previous 10 next 10 »