SB551 Testimony (Modified Business Tax)

Daniel Honchariw

Testimony in Opposition re: Senate Bill 551
Senate Finance Committee
Wednesday, May 28, 2019

 

My name is Daniel Honchariw. I serve as senior policy analyst for the Nevada Policy Research Institute.

NPRI opposes SB551 on both policy and, potentially, procedural grounds.

In terms of policy, the proposal to extend the current Modified Business Tax rate represents only the latest move to increase the cost of doing business in the Silver State. We already expect the passage of Senate Bill 312 — mandating paid sick-leave — as well as Assembly Bill 456, which will raise the state’s minimum wage to $12 over the next several years.

In each instance, such mandates effectively act to increase the tax burden on business and lessen the likelihood any business will expand, succeed, or hire additional workers.

Here, an unwillingness to allow the MBT rate to decrease, as statute currently demands, would constitute another attack against Nevada businesses, many of which had surely been operating under the impression these tax rates would decline.

In terms of our potential procedural concerns, we fear the passage of this bill with anything less than 2/3 support may conceivably create a constitutional crisis of sorts. Notwithstanding the Legislative Counsel Bureau’s recent legal opinion which suggests otherwise, it’s difficult to comprehend how the proposed MBT extension being approved with anything less than 2/3 support would pass constitutional muster because it appears to defy the plain text under Article 4 of the state constitution.

This concerns us greatly, because it virtually guarantees litigation going forward. No matter where the courts ultimately land, this benefits nobody. Not only will taxpayers be forced to spend thousands of dollars to subsidize the cost of such litigation, but there will be a looming cloud of uncertainty over the state for months, and potentially devastating budgetary implications if a court rules against the extension. It would result in absolute fiscal chaos for an unknown period of time.

Thus we urge this committee to oppose SB551.

Daniel Honchariw

Daniel Honchariw

Director of Legislative Affairs

Daniel Honchariw joined the Nevada Policy Research Institute in May 2016. He focuses mostly on fiscal and education (school choice) issues, and has also published extensively on the abuses of civil asset forfeiture. His work has been featured and/or cited by in-state and national publications including USA Today, The New Yorker, Reason, the Las Vegas Review-Journal, and the Reno Gazette-Journal.

Prior to joining, Daniel had been a lifelong California resident. His experience includes stints with the National Labor Relations Board, multiple financial services firms, and a Tahoe-based ski resort. He is a sports fanatic, political junkie, and chess enthusiast.

Daniel holds a B.S. in Industrial and Labor Relations from Cornell University (’09) and an M.P.A. in Public Management from California State University, Dominguez Hills (’14).